Will Brazil's Supreme Court rule in favor of holding internet providers and websites responsible for offensive content in 2023? No: real money 90%, play money 78% Yes: real money 10%, play money 22% Volume: real money 388.20989425, play money 7210 Bettors: real money 9, play money 4 Categories: Politics, Brazil, Judiciary Related markets Impeachment of any of Brazil's Supreme Court Justices by the end of 2026? (ID: 161037) Volume: real 2033.0296517, play 337877.09546161 Bettors: real 45, play 554 Leading (real money): Impeachment of any of Brazil's Supreme Court Justices by the end of 2026? 3% Leading (play money): Impeachment of any of Brazil's Supreme Court Justices by the end of 2026? 75% Brazil's Supreme Court expanded to more than 11 seats by the end of 2026? (ID: 161038) Volume: real 128.73949158, play 166835.26694265 Bettors: real 22, play 267 Leading (real money): Brazil's Supreme Court expanded to more than 11 seats by the end of 2026? 7% Leading (play money): Brazil's Supreme Court expanded to more than 11 seats by the end of 2026? 2%

Will Brazil's Supreme Court rule in favor of holding internet providers and websites responsible for offensive content in 2023?

Market Rules

In 2020, the then president of Brazil's Supreme Court (STF), justice Dias Toffoli, and its vice president, justice Luiz Fux, suspended the public hearings that would discuss the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, initially scheduled for March that year. The discussion about the so-called Civil Rights Framework for the Internet is the subject of Extraordinary Appeals (REs) 1037396 and 1057258.

The appeals at stake deal with the responsibility of companies that host websites to inspect published content and remove them from the air, without judicial intervention, when they are considered offensive.

If STF rules in its 2023 tenure that internet providers, websites, and social network application managers can be liable for damages resulting from unlawful acts carried out by third parties, even if there is no prior and specific court order for the exclusion of content, this market will resolve to "Yes".

People also viewed